Amtrak is a Bad Neighbor. What a Shocker.

Haverford19041's picture

Oh what to do with AMTRAK. The railroad that is our neighbor. They do not maintain their properties and when they do, it is always a study in bad extremes. Their tree maintenance comes to mind.

Like PECO they seem to employee Asplundth the tree murderers. And they have done so recently. You see, one neighbor complained to Amtrak about Amtrak's trees falling on their property, specifically their garage. Well Amtrak came out and not only stripped the trees out from behind this one neighbor's yard, but behind other neighbors' yards as well. Too bad no one else wanted the protective screening of trees clear cut, eh?
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

If THAT wasn't bad enough, they then sprayed a nasty systemic herbicide in a directionally challenged manner, and essentially wiped out a beautiful garden on private property which had be resplendant in speciman hydrangas, roses, and many perennials. Who knows for sure, but we wonder if the herbicide is also a carcinogen?
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
What Amtrak has done is truly reprehensible, and why should they be allowed to do this? We understand that they DO have to trim and occasionally cut down trees to keep tracks and wires clear, but we have to ask if things might be different if they ever just did preventative maintenance? And how can Asplundth call themselves arborists? They are tree murderers.
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
What Amtrak has done is affect the private property rights of others through their actions. Their policy of clear cutting vs. preventative maintenance has now negatively impacted homeowners by killing their gardens with wanton spraying and by esentially opening up the rear of properties to passers by on the train. One neighbor remarked that she can practically read the newspapers of people on the train. Other neighbors are pissed because they lost their privacy....privacy they paid for...Amtrak also left behind trash and ragged stumps sloppily cut. Now the looming question is: are property values adversely affected? Some homeowners think that would be a "yes".
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
lmwatcher's picture

Ahh, but cut down a tree on your own property and the township's Shade Tree police will come a knocking and tell you what to do with your own property going forward while probably fining you. The government should not be able to have it both ways or to have different standards for quasi-governmental entities and citizens, but that is obviously how it works. Those who had their property rights violated while receiving property damage should sue, but somehow I bet Amtrak has immunity one way or another.

el109's picture

Just to straighten out the facts, the Shade Tree Commission has jurisdiction over shade trees only on public property, not private. They'll be the first ones to tell you when a tree on your property is your responsibility.

lmwatcher's picture

Thanks! Here is some more info on the Shade Tree Commission.

Also of interest from the township code regarding the Shade Tree Commission:

§ 128-7. Maintenance and removal of trees on private property.

A. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, the Commission shall, upon four weeks' prior written notice to the owner of the property, require the owner to cut and remove any trees, or parts thereof, on their properties (but not in the Township right-of-way) afflicted with any disease which threatens to injure or destroy Township shade trees. Similarly, healthy trees and bushes which may constitute a public hazard, such as low limbs which interfere with the right-of-way, should be removed at the owner's expense.

B. Upon failure of the owner to comply with such notice, the Township can arrange for the work to be done and levy and collect the cost thereof from the owner of the property. The cost of such work shall be a lien upon the premises from the time of the commencement of the work, which date shall be fixed by the Director and shall be filed with the Township Secretary. Any such lien may be collected by appropriate legal action or by lien filed in the manner provided by law for the filing and collection of municipal claims.

C. The Commission shall give said four-week notice by mailing to the last known address of the owner of the property and by posting the notice at the main entrance to the main habitable or occupied structure on the property. Editor's Note: Former Subsection D, which immediately followed this subsection, was redesignated as § 128-6C 8-5-1992 by Ord. No. 3296.

Says nothing about the township removing diseased Shade Trees on public property in a certain period of time that would damage trees on private property. Sounds similar to the double-standard in the new grafitti ordinance.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.